Demolishing Homes

Spanish MEPs join criticism of holiday home law

Spanish MEPs have joined counterparts in criticising the treatment of expats who face having homes in Spain bulldozed under coastal protection law.

Rules introduced in 1988 left coastal properties liable to demolition and thousands of British and other European owners stripped of property rights.

MEPs say homeowners have been given no legal redress or compensation. They have asked for the law to be clarified.

Spain insists owners of legally built homes are being "fairly compensated".

The law was designed to protect the coast and set limits on building, allowing municipal leisure developments but not private homes.

Since its introduction, thousands of people who live or have holiday homes in Spain have discovered that properties bought legitimately through the Spanish legal system had, in fact, been built in breach of the regulations.

Meanwhile, in Andalucia, regional authorities have applied the law retrospectively to declare legitimately built properties illegal.

Since the law came into force, courts have rejected 96% of owners' appeals against expropriation, the European Parliament's petitions committee was told.

"The Spanish government must recognise that those affected must be fully compensated," said Spanish centre-right MEP Gabriel Mato.

"We are talking about people who have lived in their homes for many years and who lost their property rights without an explanation."

Despite this, the committee heard that "unfair demarcation" had left owners of some large hotels and private developments "untouched".

Mr Mato's colleague Carlos Iturgáiz asked: "How can the demarcation line be applied in a zigzag."

British MEP Michael Cashman told the committee thousands of Britons with property in regions like Andalucia, Valencia and Murcia were affected.

'Stop funding'

Mr Cashman claimed that dubious application of the law had "taken away confidence in Spain generally" and called for EU funding for Spain to be withheld until the issue was addressed.

Another British MEP, Roger Helmer, said afterwards that he had received dozens of complaints from people in his East Midlands constituency.

"Some have seen their dreams, their homes, and their life savings literally reduced to rubble before their eyes," he said.

More than 15,000 people have petitioned the committee about the issue.

Spain's general director for coast and sea sustainability, Alicia Paz AntolĂ­n, said owners who lost rights to legally built properties were being "fairly compensated".

This took the form of being given the right to stay in the property for up to 60 years, she said.

The committee is to write to the Spanish government asking for further clarifications on the application of the law and to the European Commission with a request to clarify the legal basis of the cases.


Comments

Marta said…
That's a very big problem. Spanish coasts are vanished under thousands of buildings in the last sixty years. Triying to recover it is important but, what about the owners of the houses?
And the law enforcement is being unequally: I've heard about the demolition of several humble houses, which were the only residence of their owners but I didn't hear anything about hotels and luxurious houses.
Graham said…
I suspect that many of these homes were given permission to be built by paying a bribe. The owner perhaps was unaware that a bribe had been paid but it was hidden in the cost of building.

And if the bribe was attractive enough now, I don't doubt that it would save some of the properties in danger.



That's a very big problem. THE Spanish COAST HAS vanished under thousands of buildings in the last sixty years. Trying to recover it is important but, what about the owners of the houses?

And the law enforcement is UNFAIR: I've heard about the demolition of several humble houses, which were the only residence of their owners but I didn't hear anything about hotels and luxurious houses.


On the other hand, fewer English colonies along the coastline is no bad thing.