First Harry, now Kate

Kate and William angered by 'grotesque' invasion of privacy

 
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are hugely saddened over the "grotesque and unjustifiable invasion of privacy" by a magazine which published topless photos of Kate, a royal spokesman says.

French publication Closer printed the pictures of the duchess, taken during their private holiday in France.

The royals are now considering legal action over the case.

Closer's editor says the couple were "visible from the street" and the images are "not in the least shocking".
 
 
 
 
 

Vocabulary:
 
to seek -
 
a big step -
 
to mount -
 
(a look of) thunder -
 
meanwhile -
 
not in the least + adj -
 
blurry (adj) -
 
upsetting (adj) -
 
on behalf of -
 
to be entitled to -
 
to be due to -
 
to turn down -
 
to breach -
 
to defy -
 
a warning -
 
a set of (pictures) -
 
to run (a company) -
 
a statement -
 

 
 
Do you think royalty have a right to privacy?
 
Should the magazine have published the photos?
 
Are William and Kate right to sue?
 
Would the Spanish media publish similar photos of a member of the Spanish royal family? What would the reaction be? 



Comments