Lottery ticket dishonesty

-

You've won £10, shopkeepers told Lotto winner... then they claimed his £157,000 prize for themselves

When Gwyn Badham-Davies checked his lottery ticket at his local newsagent’s, he was delighted to hear he had won £10.

But the hearty congratulations offered by shopkeeper Anne Jeevarajah as she handed over the cash concealed a cynical plot to steal the small fortune he had actually won.

Jeevarajah had discovered her loyal customer’s ticket carried five winning numbers and the bonus ball – worth £156,659.

A week after lying to Mr Badham-Davies, she and her husband Alfred contacted Camelot and tried to claim the prize. 

 Officials became suspicious, however, because of the length of time that had passed since the winning ticket had been registered on the National Lottery computer in their shop. 

Police were called in and found the Jeevarajahs could not confirm where and when the ticket had been bought. 

They have now been jailed for 14 months each after Anne Jeevarajah, 38, admitted theft and fraud, and her 45-year-old husband admitted fraud. 

Judge Alasdair Darroch, sitting at Norwich Crown Court, told them: ‘It was a flagrant breach of trust. This is the sort of matter which the public expects to be dealt with very seriously.’ 

Relatives will look after the couple’s ten-year-old daughter while they serve their sentences. Mr Badham-Davies, 73, who has since received his full winnings, said after the hearing that he forgave the Jeevarajahs.

He seemed more upset about a police ban on him visiting the shop during their investigation.

‘I don’t feel any malice or animosity. I see it as a betrayal,’ he said. ‘I feel hurt about it but they made a mistake. I forgive them. 

‘The only thing that upset me to an extent is it really spoiled my village life. 

‘I loved going into that village shop. The girls who work there are really nice and there was an ongoing friendship.’ 

Construction company owner Mr Badham-Davies normally bought lottery tickets at the Jeevarajahs’ shop in Hingham, Norfolk, every week. But on June 25 last year he picked up the winning ticket at a nearby supermarket. 

He went into the newsagent’s on July 2 to buy his usual numbers and a lucky dip. While he was there, he asked Mrs Jeevarajah to check his ticket from the previous week and she said three of his numbers had come up. 

Her husband, who came to the UK from Sri Lanka in 1989 and worked as an electrical engineer before taking over the shop six years ago, tried to claim the real prize a few days later. 

Mr Badham-Davies found out he was due to receive a six-figure windfall only when Mr Jeevarajah confessed what had happened after Norfolk Police started investigating. 

Ian James, defending the couple, told the court the family would pay a huge price, including losing their home and business. 

Villagers were shocked at the case. One man, who asked not to be named, said: ‘They seemed a very nice couple but they have destroyed the goodwill people had for them. What they did was unforgivable.’ 

A Camelot spokesman said: ‘We have information in our system which can monitor every single ticket purchased. 

‘We know when and where a line of numbers is bought and when a winning ticket is presented and scanned into a terminal. The success of the National Lottery is built on player trust and the sentences handed down provide clear evidence that Camelot will not allow that trust to be undermined in any way.’ 

Detective Constable Sophie Getley said: ‘This type of fraud is taken very seriously and will be investigated robustly.’

Source: Daily Mail 

Vocabulary:

delighted (adj) -


hearty congratulations -

a cynical plot -

 worth £ -

to claim the prize -

to jail -

theft (n) -


flagrant (adj) -

a breach of trust -

to be dealt with seriously -

to forgive (forgave, forgiven) -


upset (adj) -


a ban -

a betrayal -

to spoil -


ongoing (adj) -

to take over (a business) -

to be due to happen -

a six figure windfall -

goodwill (n) -

unforgiveable (adj) -

to purchase -


to scan (a ticket) -

trust (n) -

to hand down a sentence -


Comments

Sir Joseph said…
Hi Graham,

I´m afraid this heist happens in a lot of places and countries, not only in England. Actually it´s a theft but it´s a betrayal of trust too. I agree with judge Darroch that he said it was a flagrant breach of trust. I can see that they have been punished seriously but it´s normal. People are very upset with this kind of crime. Everyone seems that is furious in this article and I understand them.

We can forgive a cat but no these couple because the society considers that it´s unforgiveable, although his barrister said that they had lost their home and business. Villagers were shocked because they had destroyed the goodwill people, what is easy to understand, so a village is small and everyone know their neighbours. It´s possible that if this heist had happened in London or Bristol nobody had known it unless the media had broadcasted it.

See you.
Saturday, 22 January, 2022
Graham said…
Good evening José,

A heist is a robbery in which money, jewellery, or art is stolen, often violently. This case was more a fraud or con (an informal word for deceit). The shopkeeper conned their customer out of a six-figure sum.

I wonder if this con could have been planned beforehand. They might have talked about what they would do if one of their customers won big. If the customer had bought the ticket at their shop, it would have been even more difficult to get away with - which makes me think that the shopkeeper's wife did it on the spur of the moment. The real winner must have used their bank card to buy the lottery ticket otherwise I don't see how they could have identified him.



I'm afraid this kind of fraud happens in a lot of places and countries, not only in England. Actually, not only is it a theft, but it's a betrayal of trust too. I agree with judge Darroch who said it was a flagrant breach of trust. I can see that they have been severely punished but it´s normal. People are very upset with this kind of crime. Everyone in this article seems to be furious and I understand them.

We can forgive a cat but not this couple because society considers this type of offence as unforgiveable. His barrister said that they had lost their home and business. Villagers were shocked because they had destroyed the goodwill shown by people, which is easy to understand, as a village is small and everyone knows their neighbours. It´s possible that if this crime had happened in London or Bristol, nobody would have known about it unless the media reported it.
Sunday, 23 January, 2022
Post a Comment